Be of good heart: If the battle is not yet won, it is not yet lost either.
- Libertarian Motivation — Henry Hazlitt’s inspirational words.
- Commentary From Your Libertarian Opinionizer.
- The Snowman: The Book of the Film?
- The Portent & Other Stories.
On the surface it is a profoundly depressing novel, but I was surprised to find myself strangely encouraged by it. I finally decided that this encouragement arose from one of the final scenes in it. The hero, Winston Smith, is presented as a rather ordinary man, an intelligent but not a brilliant man, and certainly not a courageous one. Winston Smith has been keeping a secret diary, in which he wrote: Winston knows that the required answer is five. How many fingers am I holding up? So, before we are in the position of Winston Smith, we can surely have enough courage to keep saying that two plus two equals four.
This is the duty that is laid upon us. We have a duty to speak even more clearly and courageously, to work harder, and to keep fighting this battle while the strength is still in us. This is what he wrote in the final paragraph of his great book on socialism 40 years ago:. And no one can find a safe way out for himself if society is sweeping towards destruction. Therefore, everyone, in his own interests, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle. None can stand aside with unconcern; the interests of everyone hang on the result.
Whether he chooses or not, every man is drawn into the great historical struggle, the decisive battle into which our epoch has plunged us. Even those of us who have reached and passed our 70th birthdays cannot afford to rest on our oars and spend the rest of our lives dozing in the Florida sun. The times call for courage. The times call for hard work. But if the demands are high, it is because the stakes are even higher.
They are nothing less than the future of human liberty, which means the future of civilization.
Browse Now . . .
The Foundation for Economic Education www. Sign in Get started. This is what he wrote in the final paragraph of his great book on socialism 40 years ago: This is the principle of non-aggression.
We are anti-authoritarian and therefore anti-state. We support direct action. The Green Libertarian position is simple and compelling: Individual landowners are far more protective, responsible and in touch with their environment than government for the simple reason that distant governmental apparatchiks have no skin in the game. The ultimate argument against government environmentalism is the same as government doing anything.
Any thing that becomes politicized ceases to be about that thing and becomes all about the politics. But 6, Followers is a good start. A common charge from many uninformed people is that libertarians are all or primarily atheists. Yet a quick Facebook search turns up pages and groups with names like Libertarian Christian 23, Followers at this writing , Catholic Libertarians 12, , Jewish Libertarians 3, , Muslims for Liberty 3, , Libertarian Hindu and, yes, The Libertarian Atheist 20, Libertarians of nearly every religion seem to find much in common with their libertarian beliefs and their religious beliefs.
Not any form of Hinduism but the Dravidian Aaiyyanist form. Understanding the etymology of the word makes this simple to understand. But atheism also comes with a lot of Cold War baggage. Since the official policy of the Soviet Union was atheism some believe that all atheists are communists. Still, many people choose to self-identify in many different ways including racially or ethnically or socially or culturally or economically or any combination of uniquely distinctive ways and libertarians are among them.
A little Googling will turn up online sites for many self-descriptions, including for Black, Latino, Asian, and white libertarians. As for that last part — why are libertarians predominately white middleclass males — that is changing. The conclusion was that Americans who self-identify as libertarian reflect the racial and ethnic demography of the US more than is commonly realized.
If there is to be a Libertarian Spring it will take more than just politics. As the Objectivist community has pointed out, politics is merely the practical application of philosophy. The philosophy must come first before a theory of politics can be developed and identified.
- The Vampire Affair (Mills & Boon Nocturne)!
- What was Ayn Rand’s view of the libertarian movement? —Ayn Rand Lexicon;
- Fringe No More: Libertarians Are Everywhere Now;
- Finding Jesus — everybody will serve something?
- How to Sew: Sashiko.
- Fringe No More: Libertarians Are Everywhere Now | Soapboxie.
Because of that libertarianism, as a philosophy, must become widely identified and embraced throughout the culture before it can develop into the basis for establishing a free society. Elitist ruling interests will never willingly give up their grasp on power, wealth and ego demands without a fight, meaning they will cling desperately to everything that libertarianism despises — coercion, intimidation and fraud.
But there is hope that it can be achieved:. But the libertarian label is embraced by a more racially and ethnically diverse group of individuals than some may realize. Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites. Mama Liberty, you're right, the only limited government is a privately funded competitive government.
JSTOR: Access Check
I remember the rush of excitement reading about some libertarian group in the local paper only to discover that it actually said librarian. I also remember going to a friend's house for Christmas Dinner back then and was introduced to a pair of black African students. My friend later joked "I called the University and told them to send over a couple of libertarians and they thought I said Liberians.
Even then, they had a judge as an arbitrator, if anything came up; only nothing came up among them, because they shared the same philosophy. But if you had a society in which all shared in one philosophy, but without a government, that would be dreadful. They agreed on fundamentals, but they would never be in total agreement. But project a society of millions, in which there is every kind of viewpoint, every kind of brain, every kind of morality—and no government. Man was left at the mercy of bandits, because without government, every criminally inclined individual resorts to force, and every morally inclined individual is helpless.
Libertarian anarchism is pure whim worship, because what they refuse to recognize is the need of objectivity among men—particularly men of different views.